Skip to main content
Find a broadband deal
Fix my broadband

Openreach aims to close 100 phone exchanges by 2030

Closing of telephone exchanges is a long term thing, and the PSTN switch-off and full fibre roll-outs are the immediate and obvious signs of the long term plans Openreach have.

The Openreach telephone exchange footprint is currently around 5,500 exchanges where copper services, LLU and some fibre services such as leased lines are run from. By 2030 as part of a much larger plan Openreach is looking to close 103 of these after an initial trial of five exchanges in the 2024 to 2025 period.

For those using an Openreach part fibre or full fibre service nothing is going to change, as the fibre from the cabinet or your property already runs to a handover exchange and will not enter the local exchange building. This is why the PSTN switch off is crucial i.e. this is the main service that millions use that still needs the old exchange building. For those worrying this will make their service less reliable, the existing aggregation of fibre and voice services into the larger exchanges means that we are already as reliant on these handover exchanges.

There is a lot of work to complete before closing an exchange, hence why the list of 103 exchanges has a five year window to be actioned. The benefit for Openreach is that they can reduce the number of leases they pay, and maintenance can be streamlined. The eventual fate of the actual exchange buildings will depend on the freeholder, but with 99% of the exchanges being in central locations of towns and villages, we expect there to be a wave of change of use planning applications and homes or apartments to replace them. Repurposing the sites will be a little more complex than just bulldozing the old, invariably shabby buildings to avoid damage to the underground trunk network that may pass under the land.

For the five exchanges in the initial trial the FTTP stats are

    • Deddington (Oxfordshire): 99% FTTP coverage March 2022, 26th June 2023 98.3% FTTP coverage
    • Kenton Road (London): 93% FTTP coverage March 2022, 26th June 2023 96.2% FTTP coverage
    • Carrickfergus (NI): 98% FTTP coverage March 2022, 26th June 2023 96.2% FTTP coverage
    • Ballyclare (NI): 90% FTTP coverage March 2022, 26th June 2023 97.6% FTTP coverage
    • Glengormley (NI): 99% FTTP coverage March 2022, 26th June 2023 97% FTTP coverage

The March 2022 FTTP coverage figures are from estimates supplied by Openreach in March 2022, and we have added our own analysis of the footprints as 26th June 2023. Those where our data is higher suggests roll-outs continue, and in two Northern Ireland exchanges where it is lower, we don’t know why as earlier in June we did a massive catch-up and should not be missing anything significant. The variation is probably less than the figures suggest as getting exact property counts is very difficult even when working at the address/UPRN level and while we are confident Openreach don’t do this, we believe a good number of FTTP networks seem to include PO Boxes in their premises passed data.

For the 103 exchanges where the exchange building is set to be vacated by 2030 the FTTP statistics that we have are:

Exchange Code Exchange Name Handover Exchange Code Openreach FTTP coverage, % of premises as recorded by thinkbroadband, 26th June 2023
CLSHO Shoreditch CLFAR 1.7%
LNSTF Stratford LNMED 16.9%
WEWBAY Bayswater WEWLOR 0.8%
WRPIM Pimlico WRSTHBK 2.9%
CLSOU Southwark WRSTHBK 8.9%
WEWMAY Mayfair WRSTHBK 10.6%
LSWOO Woolwich LSTHMD 47.3%
WEWBLO Howland Street WEWMAR 4.1%
WEWNPN North Paddington WEWMAR 2.9%
CLWAP Wapping CLFAR 18.7%
WEWPAD Paddington WEWMAR 0.6%
LVCEN Liverpool Central LVBOO 31.4%
CLHOL Holborn WRSTHBK 24.6%
LWWEM Wembley LWNWEM 36.8%
CLNEW New Cross CLBER 76.2%
LSWAN Wandsworth LSBAL 48.1%
CMMLD Midland CMCEN 59.8%
WEWPRI Primrose Hill WEWLOR 2.1%
WRSKEN South Kensington WRSTHBK 45.7%
LSKIN Exchange is split across two buildings currently, so LSKIN will remain but located in a single building. 9.5%
LWHOU Hounslow LWKNE 5%
LNCED Crouch End CLUPP 2.9%
LNEDM Edmonton LNPON 23.1%
LWHARR Harrow LWHAT 12.3%
LWUXB Uxbridge LWWDRA 73.4%
LNLVY Lea Valley LNWCR 9%
WSMOT Motherwell WSHAM 72.9%
LWCHI Chiswick LWACT 5.8%
NESU Sunderland NESUN 7.6%
NDMED Chatham NDGIL 27.1%
LNFIN Finchley LNNFN 9%
CLMON Monument CLFAR 12.2%
LSRIC Richmond Kew; Surrey LSMOR 2.3%
LSSTR Streatham LSBAL 60.4%
EAGRA Grays Thurrock LNPFT 59.2%
WRKGDN Kensington Gardens WRSTHBK 5.2%
SDWTHDN Brighton Withdean SDHV 75.4%
LSWEY Weybridge LSWLTN 4.3%
LSPUR Purley LSCRO 7.6%
THAD Aldershot THFB 14.3%
EAHTF Hertford EAWAR 7.6%
WMWR Worcester WMSTP 72.1%
LWPIN Pinner LWRUI 27%
SMLEA Leagrave SMLT 1.2%
ESCRA Edinburgh Craiglockhart ESDON 79.5%
LWSTAI Staines LWEGH 75.4%
CLWOO Baynard (Wood St.) CLFAR 33%
CMDD Dudley; West Midlands CMBYL 2.8%
LWSKY Skyport LWHAY 1.2%
LSCTHM Caterham LSDOW 9.6%
LSSUN Sunbury LSMOL 76%
LSNCHM North Cheam LSSUT 0%
LVGAT Gateacre LVHUY 88.2%
LSTHDT Thames Ditton LSMOL 89.2%
EACHF Chafford LNPFT 84.2%
CMWDGT Woodgate CMHALE 90.8%
LSESH Esher LSWLTN 10.9%
SWPN Pontypridd SWLLO 2%
MRBRA Bramhall MRHUL 78.4%
SDWSWND Worthing Swandean SDWWST 62.1%
CMKNO Knowle CMSOL 39.3%
LSFARB Farnborough; Kent LSORP 68.6%
SSSHM Shepton Mallet SSMID 4.8%
LVCHI Childwall LVSEF 87.1%
WNM Mold WNDEE 10.2%
WSPRO Glasgow Provanmill WSSHE 58.1%
WMHX Headless Cross WMRJ 33.5%
SDBRCKL Bracklesham Bay SDCHCHS 8.5%
THIP Iver THSL 1.4%
CMBEAC Beacon CMGREB 97.5%
LSBKM Bookham THDK 1.3%
EMALLES Allestree Park EMDRRBB 91%
THBW  Blackwater THFB 40.2%
EABRI Brightlingsea EACOL 8.8%
MYRPP Ripponden MYELL 17.2%
EAWRI Writtle EACHE 16%
WWCHEL Chelston WWPAIG 83.1%
SMHGN Holmer Green SMHY 2.6%
WWSOME Somerton SSSTT 6.2%
SSLON Long Ashton SSBED 73%
LNNAZ Nazeing LNHOD 95.2%
LWCHO Chorleywood LWRIC 78.2%
LSBET Betchworth THDK 86.7%
MYADD Addingham MYSKP 2.7%
LVAUG Aughton Green LVMAG 85.9%
NDGUE Guestling NDHAS 6.1%
LWWRA Wraysbury LWEGH 87.4%
NDNEI Newick NDUCK 26.5%
LSMOG Mogador LSREI 5.4%
EARDH Ramsden Heath EABCY 23.9%
ESLUN Lundin Links ESLEV 99.3%
SSSOF Stratton On The Fosse SSMID 78.5%
MRCHI Chinley MRBUX 27.3%
NDSHO Shorne NDGRA 3.9%
THHN Headley Down THHM 5.1%
EMSOSHM Somersham EMSTIVE 41.1%
SLDCN Doncaster North SLDC 97.2%
WWMSMT Mawnan Smith WWFALM 27.6%
NDOTF Otford NDSEV 21.8%
EMCOGEN Cogenhoe EMWESTO 57.4%
SMLA Langford SMSFD 77.2%
WWWBAY Widemouth WWBUDE 5.8%
SLHX Haxey SLGB 11%

As the list shows current levels of FTTP coverage from Openreach vary widely, but with 7 years to the 2030 target there is lots of time to build a lot more FTTP. There is no absolute requirement for 100% FTTP as the FTTC/VDSL2 service can run without the current local exchange. For example Haxley may only have 11% FTTP coverage but once you include VDSL2 the Openreach coverage rises to 98%, so around 40 old pure copper lines that need conversion work.

Where things get more confusing is if an alt-net is using one of the smaller exchanges to house equipment, in theory the sensible ones will have planned for exchange closures in their roll-out and be running the active hardware in an exchange that is set to remain operational post 2030 but there will be those caught out. 

Reply to “Openreach aims to close 100 phone exchanges by 2030”

  1. Some other things to consider:
    – whether any ISPs have LLU equipment in the exchange
    – whether any leased line nodes are in the exchange

    The forced migration of BTW ADSL to FTTC should be taken care of as part of PSTN switchoff; SOTAP will only be available to properties with no FTTC.

    But the main one of these is the implied withdrawal of LLU (MPF). Is there a published timetable for this, per exchange, and has OFCOM agreed it?

  2. From memory , BT need to give operators who have equipment in their exchanges 2 years notice of an exchange building closing

  3. What happens to FTTC equipment that is in the exchange compound? i.e. to provide FTTC for EO lines.
    I assume these are powered from the exchange even if the fibre is run to a handover exchange.

  4. FTTC cabinets are powered from the local power network, including those located outside exchanges. Openreach were quite careful to place these either outside the boundary or on the periphery to ease future building closures as this have been the game plan going back for years.

Your name will be published with your comment. You do not need to include your full name when commenting. Your e-mail address will not be published.

Most viewed