Broadband News

Digital by default for government services risks widening divide

The UK is already one of the most digitally engaged nations in the world, and the desire to push to its ultimate conclusion where we stop picking up the telephone to ask questions about tax codes and or heaven forbid try to talk to someone physically in an office is very strong. The belief that a fully digital strategy would generate £1.7 to £1.8 billion a year in savings is the key driver, not necessarily an improvement in service levels to the public.

The costs of the various contact methods in a BBC News article highlight the scale of the savings, a face to face meeting with a local council costs £8.62, over the phone £2.83 and just 15p via a website. Though it is not clear whether things like the development costs of the website, and whether the outcome was what the public sought are mentioned.

One of the changes coming is Universal Credit that wraps up Jobseeker's Allowance, Employment and Support Allowance, Income Support, Child Tax Credits, Working Tax Credits and Housing Benefit into a single payment, with the aim being that as many people as possible will manage their claim online. For many the benefits system is seen as something that affects other people, but in an economy where companies can shut down and staff be made redundant overnight, what is of no concern this week, can suddenly be your only form of support.

Therefore the push for ubiquitous broadband is important, and is partly why the USC is set so low at 2 Mbps, as the costs to ensure this can be met should be fairly low and easily achievable. In some countries ubiquitous broadband is seen as delivered when a community centre or local library has some form of connection, so while the 2 Mbps USC is often criticised it is better than what we have seen other countries be very proud about. The previous Labour government had planned the USC to come into effect in 2012, but the Conservatives shortly after coming to power changed the timetable to 2015.

Now add into this mix the idea that for those who are in social housing tenants should be provided with free broadband. This was raised by Jake Perry (MP for Rossendale and Darwen) receiving wide support in the House of Commons, but a less favourable reaction by the wider public. To some extent the public reaction is to be expected, as many people work hard and while they accept the need for a safety net they may feel it is one step too far for their tax money to subsidise free broadband for some. We have seen schemes where social housing landlords are putting in a wireless service, which is free at a basic usage level, but for those using it more there is a subscription element.

The real question is what effect this may have on the commercial market, UK broadband is already some of the cheapest in the world, part of this is down to the credit checking and long contracts which put the poorest at a disadvantage, hence the existence of basic bank accounts.

In the five year term of the current Government, which may or may not end in 2015, the sum from central and local government spent on broadband will be around £1.5 billion. If the policy makers want to ensure that the digital divide is not widened they need to commit more money to ensuring a better base line service is available for all, as it is very likely that social housing landlords will deploy a service that actually makes the current 2 Mbps look like a 1999 broadband service.

Perhaps in our new utopia we can also look forward to better care for homeless people, improved literacy and numeracy and an upturn in the confidence of the UK as a whole.


And once everything is available on-line in this utopia, how do you combat fraud? Or as its utopia, does it disappear?

  • mervl
  • over 8 years ago

Fraud is a reality offline or online, it's worth noting that the Working tax credit system is completely off-line for this reason. Basic bank accounts are also looking like an endangered species. Libraries and charities can plug the gap in access for the disconnected, as the currently do for the illiterate etc.

  • herdwick
  • over 8 years ago

If the UK government is going to move so many services online then perhaps we need to see a committment not only to USC but also make a broadband connection an essestial service.

  • undecidedadrian
  • over 8 years ago

Again the Civil Servants will get it wrong! Few people in the financial position envisaged will have any digital service nor any computer equipment - unless it is paid for by the benefits system already. Going 'purely digital' is a serious mistake as many older people do not have nor want anything to do with computer systems or networks. The reality is it will miss the most needy and vulnerable, so is a very bad idea.

  • michaels_perry
  • over 8 years ago

OK to say use library if your local one has not been closed!

  • wil4fred
  • over 8 years ago

Free broadband for social housing tenants at taxpayers expense - to hell with the idea! They already get free everything else.

  • tomtreb
  • over 8 years ago

Last week this system was introduced. I called up for Jobseekers Allowance on monday and was told that i could only apply online. When I said I had no access i was told to contact a friend, family member or neighbour to use their machine. Failing that they offered me details of local libraries with IT equipment. When I went to my appointment on friday and mentioned this the staff knew nothing about it as they hadn't been told it was already running. I suspect the DWP are rolling this out now so they can say in a week or two that it's been running fine already

  • davend
  • over 8 years ago

Post a comment

Login Register