Broadband News

This has been going on a while though hasn't it, it this just an official announcement?

Hello, 2011 calling, they would like their news back.

An official statement was made on the BT forums in November and that was regarding the use of Kelly Communications as well as the modem swap.

This is about the modems overheating, which hadn't been confirmed by BT previously. 2012 is claiming this one back.

But they did start swapping them out last year, reported or not that's what I was getting at

But they did start swapping them out last year, reported or not that's what I was getting at

BT should tell us what make and model number is the one with overheating ! So, the customers will kept an eyes on it. Fire can start if getting too much overheating (never say it will be ok, be alert and get a replacement fast as it can!)

There are 3 confirmed versions of the modems and it's version 1 that is overheating.

Verison 1 was being swapped out v2's but it would seem these are now going to be swapped for the v3's.

Any chance of BT being swapped out for version 4 ?

To be expected i suppose, both VM and BT trying to keep margins by using lower QC criteria...

specifically Huawei 2Vand 2M versions for 3B versions. 2A versions are not being replaced under this program

The official post says that ALL modems provided before August 2011 will be replaced.

And although BT earlier don't mention overheating they say "We've been listening to customer feedback and identified a reliability problem with the modem which causes disconnections or even total loss of service."

Read overheating. Obviously whoever spoke to the register was allowed to say why and the BT mods weren't.

This has been happening for months. OR techs replace the faulty models onsite. The ONLY models known to work without error are models 2B and 3B - any other revision or model number is not up to new spec. These new models get warm but not scorching like faulty V2 etc, however if wall mounted remain nearly room temp.

If the problem is Overheating it is a potential fire hazard so BT should be contacting users and advertising in newpapers and doing a product recall

Any overheating is a safety issue and a product recall ahould be used under EU legislation

Overheating is not necessarily a safety issue, it is quite possible for the chip to get hot enough to exceed the maximum operating temperature without actually being a fire hazard.

oh he's here again, running to the defence of his beloved BT, your comments would make any other pro bt hack vomit. get back under the chairman's table gmann.

BT does a good job and not downt they will investigate why sub-spec kit was supplied. I have only two axes to grind with BT, off-shored support and there massive fault not found fine.

I have had lots of problems after upgrading to bt fibre, slow speeds, i only get 1mbps download, but the results on here, say its 34mbps http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/results/id/1327708998733512302.html

About a hour ago from now, i had no net for about 30mins, all the lights were on, on the fibre modem, but the home hub internet light was showing no net, orange, have not checked the Verison number yet, this is the 1st disconnection ive had for about 3 weeks with bt

Oh my god creaky are you obsessed by running me down? How have I defended BT? I'm saying this has been going on a while not that BT are great, its faulty kit how can it be good, where do I sing BT's praises, no-where.

Quote"Posted by Going_Digital about 12 hours ago
Overheating is not necessarily a safety issue, it is quite possible for the chip to get hot enough to exceed the maximum operating temperature without actually being a fire hazard.

Your own reply states it a potential safety & fire hazard.

It is working outside of it's design and therefor its approval paramters.

If the chip gets hot that may directly cause a fire hazard. It can also cause another component to fail which could cause a fire hazard
The fact that BT are replacing them indicates BT accept it is a serious problem

I believe the problem was first discovered because the non wall mounted modems (customers choice to wall mount or not) were under performing, low-sync rate/throughput, they have a duty to replace them all just on that basis alone.

I had mine installed in July and the engineer advised me to make sure it wasnt on the carpet as they had a habit of overheating and leaving scorch marks as they sink down. He did say there was no fire risk but it may make a mess of the carpet! I wall mounted it anyway out of the way. I happily run at around 37MB and this is through a powerline connector.

I think the problem was not that the modems were unsafe that it was costing openreach an arm and a leg to continually come out and replace them.
When I had FTTC installed in September the engineer said that for months the vast majority of calls he had were for modem swaps.

my dg834v1 overheats from time to time and slows down never set fire to my house bob, take a chill pill, i use my own equipment so cant complain if my service slows due to that. yes i know this is a fttc topic but bt supply the equipment if its not operating correctly it will effect their reliability record with the public so i can understand why they are replacing them

in nearly every post, GMANN99

Relevant to this news article? No

@Dg834

DG834 G/PN/N?

Try and get hold of a v4 if you can (not v5), then you can use custom firmware.

The manufacturer will be paying for these calls.