Skip Navigation


What do the universal broadband targets look like at this point in time?
Monday 25 July 2016 10:05:58 by Andrew Ferguson

Before we go ahead and fully add the various alt-net FTTH providers into the full superfast, 2 Mbps, 10 Mbps and other statistics we produce we thought it would be a good point to share copies of the maps for where we believe Openreach/Virgin Media and KCOM is not able to supply a 2 Mbps or 10 Mbps or better service.


Click image for full size version

The Universal Service Commitment map above shows some 65,778 postcodes where our model for broadband in the UK believes that speeds of 2 Mbps or slower are available. The postcode lookup on our broadband coverage checker highlights those postcodes when people search and we will be checking the links to the various voucher schemes to make sure the links for obtaining vouchers are up to date. Generally the vouchers are enough to allow for a free install of a satellite broadband scheme and while this will allow for basic web browsing and email the low usage allowances mean that while some video streaming is possible using up the allowance is all too easy. Some of the local authorities have extended the vouchers to cover fixed wireless schemes which generally have better usage allowances than the satellite schemes and don't suffer the high latency that is implicit in satellite connectivity.


Click image for full size version

The more rapidly changing picture is the Universal Service Obligation map, which while not in force yet (since to be enshrined in law takes time) is still worth tracking. The 151,943 postcodes forming the USO map is dropping as the BDUK roll-outs continue and already comprises just 4.3% of UK households and how far it will drop depends on precisely where the superfast roll-out goes, but it is not impossible that this may be as low as 1.5% in late 2019.

The USO and USO maps are available as layers on our checker and while we do weekly updates to the coverage percentages, we run a cycle of endeavouring to update the USO/USC map layers every fortnight.

Of course making services available in theory is not much use if people don't adopt them, and that is why we are tracking speed test results carefully so for example England has gone from 0.4 Mbps as the download speed for the slowest 10% of tests seen in July 2009 to a figure of 1.9 Mbps in June 2016.

Comments

Posted by DrMikeHuntHurtz 5 months ago
Given up on BT enabling my cabinet, going to have to settle with 4G + antenna instead.
Posted by Llety 4 months ago
Mike, don't give up.

Based on the last 8 months, OpenReach have been amazing when left to get on with the job and work with them. We are 11 sleeps away from FTTP. OK, its taken a fair amount of work on our part (like putting 1.2km of duct in the ground), but OR have really stepped up and been true partners. Things go wrong when the Welsh Government and BT get involved. OK, sample size of 2 here, but I have been very impressed with OR when I have been able to deal direct with them from near the top to their sub-sub-contractors and all between. Praise does not come lightly from my fingers.
Posted by Cwmrhos 4 months ago
No mobile phone signal so n fall back as the last commentator for us.
BT provide a basic telephone service, unable to provide broadband
We do have a sat system. Could be great if we did not live in a valley, the dish just captures a basic signal over the mountain.
Sat works but is very expensive and certainly with tight quotas we do not "benefit" from the internet.

Posted by SATSUMAS 4 months ago
This is all the biggest load of bollocks ever!
i live in an urban sprawl in Exeter..my best ever broadband internet is 2.4mb yet all i see on this site..is promise of fibre here and there, and political crap..its insulting that i pay same as some, more than others who have a proper adsl or fibre service.
You must be logged in to post comments. Click here to login.