Skip Navigation


Better mobile coverage or more money for landowners?
Tuesday 13 January 2015 13:41:42 by Andrew Ferguson

The Country Land and Business Association (CLA) is apparently angry over plans that might see Government legislation capping the amount that landowners can charge for hosting a mobile mast.

"It is wholly unjustified for Ministers to impose radical changes to the law because of unfounded claims from telecoms companies arguing that landowners are charging ransom rents. The proposals will allow future governments to conspire with multi-national communications giants to ride roughshod over the property rights of thousands of landowners throughout rural Britain."

CLA President Henry Robinson

The CLA website itself reveals that currently landowners can expect to be paid several thousand pounds a year for hosting a mobile mast, but just a few hundred for an electricity pylon. It is thought that the Government is trying to get the wayleave cost down to much closer to that of a pylon which share a similar sized footprint.

Given the poor mobile and broadband coverage in rural areas that the CLA and many other rural business associations are fond of highlighting one cannot help but be confused over the CLA campaigning for over ten years for better broadband and yet by insisting that wayleaves remain expensive for the least populated areas they are actually stifling attempts to improve mobile voice and broadband coverage.

Back in 2013, the CLA itself recommended new rates for wayleaves to its members, amounting to 25p per metre per year of duct across their land. There was a recommendation that not for profit or community solutions not be charged in return for a free connection.

Another major issue with the wayleave system is not just the level of payments, but that it can take a long time to reach an agreement, and this has certainly led to some Openreach cabinets seeing their roll-out delayed based on feedback from enquires we have made in the last year on the behalf of frustrated members of the public.

If rural mobile masts continue to cost several thousands pounds a year in wayleave the chances of reaching the promised coverage levels are very low, or the cost of mobile services will have to increase to cope with the levels of loss that rural masts in sparsely populated would then sustain.

Comments

Posted by mhisani about 1 year ago
"If rural mobile masts continue to cost several pounds a year in wayleave" I suspect you're missing the word "thousand" there. Cheers
Posted by andrew (Favicon staff member) about 1 year ago
So I was, only used to dealing with a few pounds at a time, rather than thousands :-)
Posted by mervl about 1 year ago
The serfs (the rest of us) always paid our dues to the landowners, didn't they?
Posted by petermyers about 1 year ago
quite poignant from the CLA especially on the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta maybe they could insert an additional clause about mobile phone masts.
Posted by M100 about 1 year ago
Big difference IMHO between an almost essential national infrastructure pylon and 'nice to have' mobile mast.
You must be logged in to post comments. Click here to login.