Skip Navigation

Wi-Fi coming to more places
Sunday 03 October 2010 15:10:28 by Andrew Ferguson

Almost a year ago the ambitious project to cover the whole of Swindon with Wi-Fi was announced, and while roll-out is not complete packages ranging between free and £19.99 are available.

Wallingford in Oxfordshire is now joining this wireless revolution, which was officially launched on Friday 1st October. While the project is being described as free Wi-Fi, the fact a free three month subscription was part of the launch party, suggests that packages similar to Swindon may be the plan at some point in the future, i.e. limited free time or for 24/7 connectivity a subscription will be paid.

Henley on Thames also appears to have a Mayor who wants to get in on the Wi-Fi access game, citing the example of Swindon which will have spent around £700 on each of the 1400 Wi-Fi nodes. Henley on Thames has a much smaller population and footprint than Swindow, so should be a lot less than £1,000,000 to cover with Wi-Fi. With the money local authorities are spending on Wi-Fi it might be worth looking at what is available in terms of fibre partnerships. While full fibre roll-outs of Fibre to the Premises/Home (FTTP / FTTH) often headline at £1000 per property, this should be a one-off investment that lasts for many years, and has the potential to encourage businesses to move to an area.

Municipal Wi-Fi while not as fast as fibre projects has many advantages for residents and visitors to an area, particularly with the rise of Wi-Fi and ever more capable mobile phones, the danger is that just as with the original roll-out of ADSL and then unbundled networks is that the 'unlimited' party will last until such time as networks hit original design capacity.

Security of the network is an aspect often overlooked both for these public networks and people with Wi-Fi in the home. Wi-Fi in its open form is unencrypted, so if carrying out your banking or other transactions over an open Wi-Fi network your data is potentially visible. In theory if a website is using HTTPS (secure HTTP) then any crucial data should be encrypted, but even then not all data is encrypted, possibly leaving enough information over time to encourage identity theft. The best security is to use an encrypted VPN that you start as soon as you are signed onto the network. Additionally there are the issues of copyright infringement, which is why many open Wi-Fi networks now require you to be a registered user. Of course how truthful people are in terms of contact details when signing up is another issue.


Posted by TonyHoyle over 6 years ago
I thought all these 'citywide' wifi projects had died.. The area of a wifi node is fairly small too (unless you have one huge-ass antenna, then the shared bandwidth problem will kill it anyway - you *want* the areas to be small). I suspect they'd need more than 1400 nodes.

Throw much £1m at the mobile operators and they'll make sure there are no 3g deadspots in your entire area. Throw that at BT and they'll put you at the top of the list for FTTC. Similar for Virgin. All of which are a better long term solution.
Posted by CARPETBURN over 6 years ago
Mmmmm a hackers playground
Posted by remouz over 6 years ago

You cab fin a VPN Providers List and consumers reviews on
Posted by wimwauters over 6 years ago
Chicane Internet has been running a successful and big wifi rig in their locality (Ipswich) for years (they used to be KeConnect). They use a big-ass antenna, similar to a mobile phone mast.

I'm puzzled WiMAX never took off, before the likes of Three rolled out their 3G networks?
Posted by New_Londoner over 6 years ago
Be interesting to know whether the council cleared this through the EU, and can show it does not fall foul of state aid rules by distorting the market?
You must be logged in to post comments. Click here to login.